skip to content

Site Map

Home Page

About Us

Our Services

Latest News

Case Studies

Articles

Jargon Buster

Contact Us

Accessibility

Legals

Links

Articles

What constitutes benefit?

In the case of Chapman vs Chapman [1954] the court found that it had no inherent jurisdiction to approve a variation of trusts for minor, unborn or unascertained beneficiaries just on the ground that the variation was for their benefit. The position was changed by the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 (the 1958 Act).

Read more