Site Map
Home Page
About Us
Our Services
Latest News
Case Studies
Articles
Jargon Buster
Contact Us
Accessibility
Legals
Links
Articles
What constitutes benefit?
In the case of Chapman vs Chapman [1954] the court found that it had no inherent jurisdiction to approve a variation of trusts for minor, unborn or unascertained beneficiaries just on the ground that the variation was for their benefit. The position was changed by the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 (the 1958 Act).
Latest News
FSD determination in Box Clever case
31/01/2012
The Pensions Regulator has today published the Determinations Panel's determination notice and reasons relating to its decision to issue Financial...
Regulator sets scene for 2012 DB communications
17/01/2012
The Pensions Regulator today sets out in more detail its plans for communicating with the pensions sector on defined benefit (DB) issues in coming...